The Honorable Angie K. Schneider

Angie K. Schneider
District Court Judge
12th Judicial District
Lincoln and Otero Counties
Year: 2026

Evaluation: Overall, Judge Angie K. Schneider’s evaluation was positive. Attorneys rated her highly for treating all courtroom participants with respect, treating self-represented parties fairly, maintaining professional demeanor in the courtroom, and for being attentive to the proceedings. Court staff and jurors rated her positively on all attributes. Resource staff (e.g., law enforcement officers, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) rated Judge Schneider positively in several areas. However, resource staff rated her lower in the areas of clear and thorough oral decisions/communications and being punctual in commencing proceedings. Judge Schneider discussed the changes and efforts she has already made to improve these scores among resource staff and is confident in and dedicated to improving in these areas.

Experience & Education: Judge Angie K. Schneider was elected to district judgeship in 2014. Prior to being elected, she worked in private practice specializing in adult criminal, juvenile justice, child welfare, domestic relations, government, and civil law from 2003 to 2013. She also served with the State of New Mexico Public Defender’s Office from 2001 to 2003. Judge Schneider received her undergraduate degree from the University of New Mexico in 1998 and her law degree from University of New Mexico School of Law.

Recommendation: 
Retain
Results: 

PERCENTAGE THAT AGREE OR DISAGREE THAT THE JUSTICE EXHIBITS POSITIVE QUALITIES IN EACH CATEGORY

The “Agree” columns are comprised of the strongly agree and agree responses. Similarly, the “Disagree” columns are comprised of the strongly disagree and disagree responses. The combined percentage of “Agree”, “Disagree”, and “Partly Agree/Partly Disagree” for each category may not equal 100% due to rounding error. Some of the percentages that are reported in the above categories are an average of more than one question that appeared on the survey.

Attorneys (n=33, 61% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 91% 6% 3%
Fair and Impartial 83% 7% 10%
Application/Knowledge of Law 82% 14% 4%
Communication Is Clear 82% 15% 3%
Professional Demeanor 85% 15% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 79% 15% 6%
Court Staff (n=21)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Professional Demeanor 95% 0% 5%
Respects Court Employees 86% 10% 5%
Jurors (n=69, 28% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 96% 1% 3%
Communication Is Clear 94% 5% 2%
Professional Demeanor 97% 3% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 89% 7% 4%
Resource Staff (n=16)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 63% 20% 18%
Communication Is Clear 57% 14% 29%
Professional Demeanor 80% 7% 13%
Preparation and Attentiveness 67% 22% 11%
Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.