The Honorable Jarod K. Hofacket

Jarod K. Hofacket
District Court Judge
6th Judicial District
Grant, Hidalgo, and Luna Counties
Year: 2026

Evaluation: Overall, Judge Jarod Hofacket’s scores were quite positive. For example, attorneys rated him highly for being punctual in commencing proceedings, being attentive to the proceedings, maintaining proper control over the proceedings, and for ensuring his personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. The court staff rated Judge Hofacket positively on all attributes, and the resource staff (e.g. law enforcement, probation/parole, CASA volunteers, CYFD, interpreters, etc.) and jurors rated him highly in all areas.

Experience & Education: Judge Jarod Hofacket was appointed to the District Court in November of 2016. He worked in private practice from 2003 to 2016 prior to his appointment to the District Court. Judge Hofacket received his bachelor’s degree from New Mexico State University in 1999 and law degree from the Texas Tech University School of Law in 2003.

Recommendation: 
Retain
Results: 

PERCENTAGE THAT AGREE OR DISAGREE THAT THE JUSTICE EXHIBITS POSITIVE QUALITIES IN EACH CATEGORY

The “Agree” columns are comprised of the strongly agree and agree responses. Similarly, the “Disagree” columns are comprised of the strongly disagree and disagree responses. The combined percentage of “Agree”, “Disagree”, and “Partly Agree/Partly Disagree” for each category may not equal 100% due to rounding error. Some of the percentages that are reported in the above categories are an average of more than one question that appeared on the survey.

Attorneys (n=31, 43% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 87% 10% 3%
Fair and Impartial 88% 3% 9%
Application/Knowledge of Law 86% 10% 4%
Communication Is Clear 85% 10% 5%
Professional Demeanor 87% 10% 3%
Preparation and Attentiveness 92% 5% 2%
Court Staff (n=23)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Professional Demeanor 91% 4% 4%
Respects Court Employees 91% 4% 4%
Jurors (n=26, 32% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 100% 0% 0%
Communication Is Clear 99% 1% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Preparation and Attentiveness 100% 0% 0%
Resource Staff (n=16)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 98% 2% 0%
Communication Is Clear 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 94% 0% 6%
Preparation and Attentiveness 96% 4% 0%
Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.