The Honorable C. Shannon Bacon

C. Shannon Bacon
Supreme Court Justice
Statewide
Year: 2026

Evaluation: Justice C. Shannon Bacon’s overall results are mostly positive. For example, attorneys rated the Justice positively for being prepared for oral arguments and court proceedings, being knowledgeable regarding substantive law, following the legal rules that applied to the case at issue, and for providing court participants with a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The court staff and her fellow appellate judges/justices rated her positively in all areas.

Experience & Education: Justice C. Shannon Bacon was appointed to the New Mexico Supreme Court in 2019 and elected in 2020. Prior to her appointment and election to the New Mexico Supreme Court, Justice Bacon was a district court judge in the 2nd Judicial District from 2010 until 2019. Justice Bacon received her undergraduate degree in 1993 and her law degree in 1997 from Creighton University.

Recommendation: 
Retain
Results: 

PERCENTAGE THAT AGREE OR DISAGREE THAT THE JUSTICE EXHIBITS POSITIVE QUALITIES IN EACH CATEGORY

The “Agree” columns are comprised of the strongly agree and agree responses. Similarly, the “Disagree” columns are comprised of the strongly disagree and disagree responses. The combined percentage of “Agree”, “Disagree”, and “Partly Agree/Partly Disagree” for each category may not equal 100% due to rounding error. Some of the percentages that are reported in the above categories are an average of more than one question that appeared on the survey.

Attorneys (n=119, 26% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 71% 17% 13%
Fair and Impartial 72% 13% 15%
Application/Knowledge of Law 75% 11% 14%
Professional Demeanor 67% 11% 23%
Timeliness of Rulings 76% 13% 11%
Court Staff (n=14, 17% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 79% 11% 10%
Application/Knowledge of Law 86% 0% 14%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 93% 0% 7%
Timeliness of Rulings 100% 0% 0%
Appellate Judges (n=11, 73% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 79% 20% 1%
Fair and Impartial 90% 10% 0%
Application/Knowledge of Law 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 75% 13% 13%
Professional Demeanor 78% 22% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 70% 20% 10%
District Judges (n=28, 35% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 74% 17% 9%
Application/Knowledge of Law 56% 30% 15%
Timeliness of Rulings 62% 15% 23%
Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.