The Honorable David K. Thomson

David K. Thomson
Supreme Court Justice
Statewide
Year: 2026

Evaluation: Justice David K. Thomson received an overall positive evaluation. For example, attorneys rated him positively for providing court participants with a meaningful opportunity to be heard, treating courtroom participants with respect, and for performing duties fairly and impartially. The court staff rated Justice Thompson very highly on every attribute.

Experience & Education: Justice David K. Thomson was appointed to the New Mexico Supreme Court in 2019 and was elected in 2020. Prior to being appointed to the Supreme Court, he was a judge in the First Judicial District, worked in private practice, served at the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office, and was a law clerk in U.S. District Court. Justice Thomson received his undergraduate degree from Wesleyan University in 1991 and his law degree from University of Denver Sturm College of Law in 1998.

Recommendation: 
Retain
Results: 

PERCENTAGE THAT AGREE OR DISAGREE THAT THE JUSTICE EXHIBITS POSITIVE QUALITIES IN EACH CATEGORY

The “Agree” columns are comprised of the strongly agree and agree responses. Similarly, the “Disagree” columns are comprised of the strongly disagree and disagree responses. The combined percentage of “Agree”, “Disagree”, and “Partly Agree/Partly Disagree” for each category may not equal 100% due to rounding error. Some of the percentages that are reported in the above categories are an average of more than one question that appeared on the survey.

Attorneys (n=112, 25% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 76% 13% 11%
Fair and Impartial 84% 8% 7%
Application/Knowledge of Law 83% 8% 8%
Professional Demeanor 85% 8% 8%
Timeliness of Rulings 76% 10% 15%
Court Staff (n=15, 19% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 97% 3% 0%
Application/Knowledge of Law 100% 0% 0%
Respects Court Employees 100% 0% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 86% 14% 0%
Appellate Judges (n=11, 73% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 78% 20% 2%
Fair and Impartial 90% 10% 0%
Application/Knowledge of Law 90% 10% 0%
Respects Court Employees 80% 20% 0%
Professional Demeanor 100% 0% 0%
Timeliness of Rulings 63% 25% 13%
District Judges (n=31, 39% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 73% 16% 10%
Application/Knowledge of Law 68% 10% 23%
Timeliness of Rulings 55% 21% 24%
Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.