The Honorable Jill M. Martinez

Jill M. Martinez
Metropolitan Court Judge
Bernalillo County
Year: 2026

Evaluation: Overall, Judge Jill M. Martinez’s scores are positive. For example, attorneys rated her positively for being prepared for court proceedings, being attentive to the proceedings, treating pro se parties fairly, and for ensuring her personal staff is professional, productive, and knowledgeable of court policies and procedures. In addition, the court staff rated her positively in all areas.

Experience & Education: Judge Jill M. Martinez was elected to Metro Court in 2014. She received her law degree from the University of Idaho in 2004 and was in private practice where she specialized in criminal defense and domestic relations. Prior to that, she served as Assistant District Attorney in the Second Judicial District from 2004 to 2012. She acts as a Volunteer Judge in Gene Franchini Mock Trials, is a guest lecturer at Columbia University, and is a Presenter at the National Judicial College, among other community organizations she is involved in.

Recommendation: 
Retain
Results: 

PERCENTAGE THAT AGREE OR DISAGREE THAT THE JUSTICE EXHIBITS POSITIVE QUALITIES IN EACH CATEGORY

The “Agree” columns are comprised of the strongly agree and agree responses. Similarly, the “Disagree” columns are comprised of the strongly disagree and disagree responses. The combined percentage of “Agree”, “Disagree”, and “Partly Agree/Partly Disagree” for each category may not equal 100% due to rounding error. Some of the percentages that are reported in the above categories are an average of more than one question that appeared on the survey.

Attorneys (n=37, 30% Response Rate)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Exhibits Integrity 81% 3% 16%
Fair and Impartial 82% 6% 12%
Application/Knowledge of Law 78% 8% 14%
Communication Is Clear 86% 8% 5%
Professional Demeanor 78% 5% 16%
Preparation and Attentiveness 90% 5% 5%
Court Staff (n=25)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Professional Demeanor 80% 12% 8%
Respects Court Employees 80% 12% 8%
Resource Staff (n=10)
Category Agree Partly Agree / Partly Disagree Disagree
Fair and Impartial 66% 14% 20%
Communication Is Clear 67% 11% 22%
Professional Demeanor 67% 11% 22%
Preparation and Attentiveness 67% 22% 11%
Please Note: Due to the small sample size among Resource Staff, caution should be exercised when interpreting the findings or drawing conclusions from the results among the Resource Staff population.
Scroll to Top

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.